Here are pictures that tell the story of a week: a finished quilt, a new-and-improved bottle tree, and a visit from Liam. The quilt got to Dad in time for Father’s Day; the bottle tree is withstanding the Oklahoma wind (although I sacrificed a Trader Joe’s tote to Aeolus oklahomus last week), and Liam washed those and all the other dishes we produced last weekend.

Now I’m writing my paper for the upcoming CHEIRON meeting and getting ready for my research trip to Glasgow. Busy times!

 Anyone who knows about my interests in analogies for social organization drawn from nature will understand why I like the Cooperative’s logo — beehives and honey — with the motto, “Like minds, acting together and sharing the rewards.” In addition to its values of equality, self-help, and democracy, The Cooperative stands, these days, for Fair Trade, for active citizenship, for environmental responsibility, and for ethical treatment of animals and people. 

So failure? Standing by the Robert Owen statue around the corner from Holyoake House, the answer came pretty easily: in the long run, Owen’s communities were not failures — they were experiments. The modern cooperative movement owes more to William King and George Holyoake and the Rochdale Pioneers than to Owen, but the seeds of the movement were there in “village of co-operation” at New Lanark and in the London Equitable Labour Exchange.

The question of “failure” is really a question about what science is, what it looks like, and what it produces. If we take New Harmony on its own terms, for example, it would appear to be a failure, as Owen lost a great deal of money in it. But if we take it to have been an experiment, it becomes one is a series of Owenite experiments, and we then value it differently, especially if we consider a The Cooperative Group to be one of its products, and we agree with the choices being made by that group. And just in case you’re starting to think of The Cooperative as a big-brother-style corporation, remember that it’s choices are the result of the opinions of all of its members, not just a board of directors or CEO.

If I were writing about the physical or life sciences — say, Watson and Crick in the laboratory, trying to figure out the structure of DNA, a “failed” experiment and the knowledge gained from it would be par for the course. But social experiments are trickier, as it is harder to trace their beginnings, their conclusions, and the conclusions that can be drawn from them. In short, looking at social experiments is a sticky endeavor — what all can be categorized as one? Is it necessary that, in order to be called an experiment, a social experiment must be conducted under similar conditions as a laboratory experiment, with controls and variables? Does it matter if someone is intentionally “conducting” the experiment or not? To use one extreme example: Primo Levi wrote in Survival in Auschwitz that Auschwitz was itself a large scientific experiment, one in which human nature was exposed to its bare, raw limits. He posited that we can learn more about human nature from what happened there than we can from day-to-day life, just as we can only learn some scientific “facts,” such as the structure of DNA, from specialised laboratory conditions. His conclusion strikes many people as odd, because we think of experiments as moments in time in which actors intentionally manipulate variables in order to find out something, not in order to exterminate a group of people. In the case of Auschwitz, learning was a byproduct of hatred.

I’m not interested in hagiography and I am not advocating Owenite or co-operative principles in my work. But as I stood in the “cooperation” part of Manchester today, outside The Co-operative grocery, I did see Owen’s place in the history of some of my own world, and of some of the variables I hope we are still tweaking in our own daily experiments. This is why studying social experiments is so difficult: it’s really not that different from day-to-day life — after all, many people work daily to make a better world. The quest to make life “better” motivates Democrats, Republicans, Tories and Labour and, as I remind my HSCI 3550 students, the Nazis were engaged in an attempt to make a better world too. The difference is the principles and values engaged in the endeavor and the vision of what the better world will look like.

Even if he suffered from some early-nineteenth-century form of Attention Deficit Disorder, and ran from experiment to experiment as the spirit took him, Owen provided his society with “A New View,” which we can still see, especially in Manchester. Cooperative values — reminding me of my childhood favorite No Fighting, No Biting — are all around me, and failure has become, for me, redefined.

Aunt Helen turned 101 on 21 September. I hope I look this good if I get to be her age. I hope I look this good now!

Yesterday I managed to stay up until mid-afternoon; I took a nap and then went back to bed after dinner (Alissa made a veggie soup) and watching Ugly Betty, an American TV show I’ve never watched until I get the the UK! I slept much later this morning than I’d planned but I didn’t hear my alarm.

This afternoon Alissa took me into town (Manchester) and we found the Cooperative College, the location of my archive. I really appreciate her taking the time to help me figure out how to get to there — I might have been really lost otherwise! The 192 bus goes straight from a very close stop into city center, from which it is only a 10 minute walk or so to the Robert Owen part of town. This statue (see picture) is there — I’ve looked at pics of this more times than I can count and then — voila — there it was right before my eyes. Alissa even saw it before I did; she said “Hey, isn’t this your guy?”

After locating my archive, I got a cell phone, got some foundation at a Clinique counter (forgot my Almay — boo!) and we took the bus home. I did a little more grocery shopping, and now I’m in for the night. I’m still a little tired but less anxious about Monday. I need to do more preparation before I’m ready, so tomorrow I’ll stay around the house and read.

I was so happy to see a panel of experts revisiting this subject this week — turns out, we still dream of going back to simpler times. The panelists on “In the Know, with Clifford Banes” ask, Should Americans Return To A Simpler, Stone Age Lifestyle?

I’m back today, though, because I’m going to start populating the blog with resources. This is what I wanted to do originally, so I’m starting with a particular project I’m working on right now. I leave for Manchester in two weeks to visit the Cooperative College Archive and get my Robert Owen on. Here are some great resources for figuring out the early nineteenth century — in no particular order.

1.Bibliographic tools for Nineteenth Century British Periodicals from the University of Minnesota

2. CURL is the Consortium for Research Libraries in the UK.  Here’s a handy guide for locating collections of 19th century pamphlets (through CURL).

3. The UK’s National Archives and the Archives Hub have both been useful. See also the Archives Network for Welsh history and the Scottish Archive Network.

4. The Mothership and its satellite

5. Places to study in London: UCL, and the University of London’s collections, especially, for my needs, the Goldsmith’s collection of economic literature.

6. The National Archives in Scotland, University of Edinburgh Special Collections, and Glasgow University Libraries.

7. One of my faves: the Victorian Literary Studies Archive Hyperconcordance.

8. Two other great resources for Victorian studies: the Victorian Literary Studies Archive, and The Victorian Web.

This lady says that when she looks at Jordin she sees “diabetes . . . heart disease . . . and high cholesterol.” This crazy woman (I’m holding my tongue here) would have all young girls look like Keira Knightley and Nicole Richie, and discriminate against others in the name of health. This attitude is widespread (even within my own circle of acquaintances!!) — ask anyone on the street, and they’d agree with this commentator that Keira and Nicole — well, Keira at least — are “healthier.”

It is just as discriminatory to make judgements and draw conclusions about a person’s health based on their physical appearance as it is to stereotype based on any other characteristic, for any other cause. We pay health care professionals to tell us why we’re ill, and very often they use visual clues in order to figure that out. But they also perform tests, and use other means to understand the causes of our problems. We certainly don’t pay people like Meme Roth (Meme??) to tell us. Or maybe, in tuning in to crappy news chanels and buying slick magazines with advertisements from drug companies in them, we do.

I finished grading only after cleaning the house, though. What is it about a stack of papers that spurs me to get out the dustrags and vacuum cleaner? It didn’t help that, even though school was not yet officially over, I’d already begun slipping into some of my standard summer activities. I opened the door to the sewing room and started cleaning a little in preparation for a summertime project (probably a quilt). I planted tomatoes and cucumbers about four weeks ago and have been involved in the basic upkeep of them. It’s rained a lot, so I haven’t had to do a lot of watering, but I’ve had quite a few weeds in the cucumbers. Here are some pictures of my ‘maters — I’ve got five already and I love checking on them every day and monitoring their subtle shifts in color.